Summary
Heather is a little girl who is hesitant to go to preschool for the first time. While playing and talking with her new friends, she is surprised to learn that other children have daddies, while she has two mommies. She wonders if there is something wrong with her family. The teacher leads the students in a discussion about the many ways that families are made up. In the end, Heather discovers that the members of a family are not so important as the love that exists between those members.
Newman, L., & Souza, D. (2000). Heather has two mommies (2nd ed., 10th anniversary ed.). Los Angeles: Alyson Wonderland.
My impressions
Being from a town whose members challenged this book and rallied for its removal from the public library, I was very anxious to finally read it. Being that homosexuality is such a hot-button topic, I understand why this book has been challenged so frequently. However, I think that the book does an excellent job of depicting tolerance and diversity in a gentle, age-appropriate way. It is critical that children see positive depictions of their families in the books they read, and Heather Has Two Mommies does that. It depicts not only lesbian couples, but also gay male couples, single moms, adopted families, and traditional male/female couples.
Reviews
Heather Has Two Mommies. (2005). Book Links, 14(3), 31.
Heather feels left out because she doesn't have a daddy; instead, she has two mommies. Then Heather's preschool teacher asks the children to draw pictures of the people in their families, and Heather realizes that families are defined by the common fact that family members love one another. Although the message is one of appreciation of diversity, the more distant third-person narration and black-and-white illustrations make this less engaging than other picture books listed here.Suggestion for library use
After reading this book to students, I might lead them in a casual conversation about who makes up their family, much as the teacher did in the story. I would make an effort to keep the tone casual so that the conversation felt more like a discussion than a sermon on tolerance.